[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <840f8c4f-0994-fa7d-0b8d-ad2c8d77c67d@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:59:40 -0800
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API
On 02/21/2018 02:01 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 21-02-18 10:55:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Hmm, I guess I can see it. Does the following help?
> ---
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 7c204e3d132b..a963f2034dfc 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ static struct page *alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> page = NULL;
> } else {
> h->surplus_huge_pages++;
> - h->nr_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
> + h->surplus_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
> }
>
> out_unlock:
I thought we had this corrected in a previous version of the patch.
My apologies for not looking more closely at this version.
FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists