[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180221185425.GK2231@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:54:25 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API
On Wed 21-02-18 09:59:40, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 02/21/2018 02:01 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 21-02-18 10:55:26, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Hmm, I guess I can see it. Does the following help?
> > ---
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index 7c204e3d132b..a963f2034dfc 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ static struct page *alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > page = NULL;
> > } else {
> > h->surplus_huge_pages++;
> > - h->nr_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
> > + h->surplus_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
> > }
> >
> > out_unlock:
>
> I thought we had this corrected in a previous version of the patch.
> My apologies for not looking more closely at this version.
I must have screwed up when rebasing. I remember I was splitting this
patch...
> FWIW,
> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists