lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdaxkMn2UxURSB4fWep=iv4CRAkmEtdKBp1HKyxtW2tTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:28:41 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] proc: make /proc/*/cmdline go through LSM

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:23 PM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> /proc/*/cmdline is not different from /proc/*/environ as it accesses
> target task's memory (and can access the very same region of memory)
> but it doesn't go through ptrace_may_access() and thus doesn't go through LSM.

> +static int __mem_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int mode)
> +{
> +       struct mm_struct *mm = proc_mem_open(inode, mode);
> +
> +       if (IS_ERR(mm))
> +               return PTR_ERR(mm);

So, is it possible to have it NULL?..

> +
> +       file->private_data = mm;
> +       return 0;
> +}

> +static int mem_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> +{
> +       struct mm_struct *mm = file->private_data;

> +       if (mm)

...or I don't get this check.

> +               mmdrop(mm);
> +       return 0;
> +}

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ