lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFytF4-B8pV5+aoNUi8ZpeSpsTdik23_Ltq9=Vu-MH=JAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:52:33 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Joe Konno <joe.konno@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
        Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/efivarfs: restrict inode permissions

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:21 AM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> How about uid name spaces? Someone untrusted in a container could
> create a lot of uids and switch between them.

Anybody who does that deserves whatever the hell they get.

You can already blow out a lot of other resources that way. If you can
create users indiscriminately enough, you can bypass most other
resource limits too.

If you think containers protect against security issues from untrusted
users, I have a bridge to sell you.

              Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ