linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:40:09 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically


> Will do. What about this (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/867169/)
> one? It's part of a bigger series, do you want me to apply it to my
> tree and provide you with an immutable branch?

Well, I would accept it for 4.16 using the "plain new id" rule. So, if
you add it on top of Peter's sorting patch, totally fine by me.

If you want it in v4.17, ok, too. I'd think an immutable branch is not
needed. There is a fallback property in the DTS. So at worst, there will
be a DTS warning during the merge window which will be fixed at rc1 time.

Unless I overlooked something.


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)