linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Check negative value returned by cpufreq_table_find_index

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:32:09 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Check negative value returned by
 cpufreq_table_find_index_dl()

On 21-02-18, 10:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> To be precise, ->init() should fail as that's where the table is
> created.  The registration fails as a result then.
> 
> But what if the bug is that ->init() doesn't fail when it should?
> 
> I guess the core could double check the frequency table after ->init()
> if ->target_index is not NULL.
> 
> The overall point here is that if you get a negative index in
> ->fast_switch(), that's way too late anyway and we should be able to
> catch that error much earlier.

I don't want to end up doing double checking as some of it is already
done at init, but let me check on what can be done.

-- 
viresh