linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 04/77] rtc-opal: Fix handling of firmware error codes, prevent busy loops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180221124432.350707446@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:48:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 04/77] rtc-opal: Fix handling of firmware error codes, prevent busy loops

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit 5b8b58063029f02da573120ef4dc9079822e3cda upstream.

According to the OPAL docs:
  skiboot-5.2.5/doc/opal-api/opal-rtc-read-3.txt
  skiboot-5.2.5/doc/opal-api/opal-rtc-write-4.txt

OPAL_HARDWARE may be returned from OPAL_RTC_READ or OPAL_RTC_WRITE and
this indicates either a transient or permanent error.

Prior to this patch, Linux was not dealing with OPAL_HARDWARE being a
permanent error particularly well, in that you could end up in a busy
loop.

This was not too hard to trigger on an AMI BMC based OpenPOWER machine
doing a continuous "ipmitool mc reset cold" to the BMC, the result of
that being that we'd get stuck in an infinite loop in
opal_get_rtc_time().

We now retry a few times before returning the error higher up the
stack.

Fixes: 16b1d26e77b1 ("rtc/tpo: Driver to support rtc and wakeup on PowerNV platform")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v3.19+
Signed-off-by: Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static void tm_to_opal(struct rtc_time *
 static int opal_get_rtc_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 {
 	long rc = OPAL_BUSY;
+	int retries = 10;
 	u32 y_m_d;
 	u64 h_m_s_ms;
 	__be32 __y_m_d;
@@ -67,8 +68,11 @@ static int opal_get_rtc_time(struct devi
 		rc = opal_rtc_read(&__y_m_d, &__h_m_s_ms);
 		if (rc == OPAL_BUSY_EVENT)
 			opal_poll_events(NULL);
-		else
+		else if (retries-- && (rc == OPAL_HARDWARE
+				       || rc == OPAL_INTERNAL_ERROR))
 			msleep(10);
+		else if (rc != OPAL_BUSY && rc != OPAL_BUSY_EVENT)
+			break;
 	}
 
 	if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS)
@@ -84,6 +88,7 @@ static int opal_get_rtc_time(struct devi
 static int opal_set_rtc_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 {
 	long rc = OPAL_BUSY;
+	int retries = 10;
 	u32 y_m_d = 0;
 	u64 h_m_s_ms = 0;
 
@@ -92,8 +97,11 @@ static int opal_set_rtc_time(struct devi
 		rc = opal_rtc_write(y_m_d, h_m_s_ms);
 		if (rc == OPAL_BUSY_EVENT)
 			opal_poll_events(NULL);
-		else
+		else if (retries-- && (rc == OPAL_HARDWARE
+				       || rc == OPAL_INTERNAL_ERROR))
 			msleep(10);
+		else if (rc != OPAL_BUSY && rc != OPAL_BUSY_EVENT)
+			break;
 	}
 
 	return rc == OPAL_SUCCESS ? 0 : -EIO;