linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 66/77] x86/cpu: Change type of x86_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:49:15 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 66/77] x86/cpu: Change type of x86_cache_size variable to unsigned int

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>

commit 24dbc6000f4b9b0ef5a9daecb161f1907733765a upstream.

Currently, x86_cache_size is of type int, which makes no sense as we
will never have a valid cache size equal or less than 0. So instead of
initializing this variable to -1, it can perfectly be initialized to 0
and use it as an unsigned variable instead.

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1464429
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180213192208.GA26414@embeddedor.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h      |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c          |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c            |    4 ++--
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
 	char			x86_vendor_id[16];
 	char			x86_model_id[64];
 	/* in KB - valid for CPUS which support this call: */
-	int			x86_cache_size;
+	unsigned int		x86_cache_size;
 	int			x86_cache_alignment;	/* In bytes */
 	/* Cache QoS architectural values: */
 	int			x86_cache_max_rmid;	/* max index */
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_
 	int i;
 
 	c->loops_per_jiffy = loops_per_jiffy;
-	c->x86_cache_size = -1;
+	c->x86_cache_size = 0;
 	c->x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_UNKNOWN;
 	c->x86_model = c->x86_stepping = 0;	/* So far unknown... */
 	c->x86_vendor_id[0] = '\0'; /* Unset */
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ static struct microcode_ops microcode_in
 
 static int __init calc_llc_size_per_core(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
-	u64 llc_size = c->x86_cache_size * 1024;
+	u64 llc_size = c->x86_cache_size * 1024ULL;
 
 	do_div(llc_size, c->x86_max_cores);
 
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file
 	}
 
 	/* Cache size */
-	if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0)
-		seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
+	if (c->x86_cache_size)
+		seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %u KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
 
 	show_cpuinfo_core(m, c, cpu);
 	show_cpuinfo_misc(m, c);