[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180221042457.uolmhlmv5je5dqx7@xps>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:24:57 -0600
From: Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mm, hugetlb: further simplify hugetlb allocation API
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 10:32:12AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>
> Hugetlb allocator has several layer of allocation functions depending
> and the purpose of the allocation. There are two allocators depending
> on whether the page can be allocated from the page allocator or we need
> a contiguous allocator. This is currently opencoded in alloc_fresh_huge_page
> which is the only path that might allocate giga pages which require the
> later allocator. Create alloc_fresh_huge_page which hides this
> implementation detail and use it in all callers which hardcoded the
> buddy allocator path (__hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page). This shouldn't
> introduce any funtional change because both migration and surplus
> allocators exlude giga pages explicitly.
>
> While we are at it let's do some renaming. The current scheme is not
> consistent and overly painfull to read and understand. Get rid of prefix
> underscores from most functions. There is no real reason to make names
> longer.
> * alloc_fresh_huge_page is the new layer to abstract underlying
> allocator
> * __hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page becomes shorter and neater
> alloc_buddy_huge_page.
> * Former alloc_fresh_huge_page becomes alloc_pool_huge_page because we put
> the new page directly to the pool
> * alloc_surplus_huge_page can drop the opencoded prep_new_huge_page code
> as it uses alloc_fresh_huge_page now
> * others lose their excessive prefix underscores to make names shorter
Hi Michal -
We (Linaro) run the libhugetlbfs test suite continuously against
mainline and recently (Feb 1), the 'counters' test started failing on
with the following error:
root@...alhost:~# mount_point="/mnt/hugetlb/"
root@...alhost:~# echo 200 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
root@...alhost:~# mkdir -p "${mount_point}"
root@...alhost:~# mount -t hugetlbfs hugetlbfs "${mount_point}"
root@...alhost:~# export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/root/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs-2.20/obj64
root@...alhost:~# /root/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs-2.20/tests/obj64/counters
Starting testcase "/root/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs-2.20/tests/obj64/counters", pid 3319
Base pool size: 0
Clean...
FAIL Line 326: Bad HugePages_Total: expected 0, actual 1
Line 326 refers to the test source @
https://github.com/libhugetlbfs/libhugetlbfs/blob/master/tests/counters.c#L326
I bisected the failure to this commit. The problem is seen on multiple
architectures (tested x86-64 and arm64).
Thanks,
Dan
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 7dc80cbe8e89..60acd3e93a95 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1378,7 +1378,7 @@ pgoff_t __basepage_index(struct page *page)
> return (index << compound_order(page_head)) + compound_idx;
> }
>
> -static struct page *__hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page(struct hstate *h,
> +static struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page(struct hstate *h,
> gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, nodemask_t *nmask)
> {
> int order = huge_page_order(h);
> @@ -1396,34 +1396,49 @@ static struct page *__hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page(struct hstate *h,
> return page;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Common helper to allocate a fresh hugetlb page. All specific allocators
> + * should use this function to get new hugetlb pages
> + */
> +static struct page *alloc_fresh_huge_page(struct hstate *h,
> + gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, nodemask_t *nmask)
> +{
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> + page = alloc_gigantic_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nmask);
> + else
> + page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, gfp_mask,
> + nid, nmask);
> + if (!page)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> + prep_compound_gigantic_page(page, huge_page_order(h));
> + prep_new_huge_page(h, page, page_to_nid(page));
> +
> + return page;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Allocates a fresh page to the hugetlb allocator pool in the node interleaved
> * manner.
> */
> -static int alloc_fresh_huge_page(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
> +static int alloc_pool_huge_page(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
> {
> struct page *page;
> int nr_nodes, node;
> gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_THISNODE;
>
> for_each_node_mask_to_alloc(h, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
> - if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> - page = alloc_gigantic_page(h, gfp_mask,
> - node, nodes_allowed);
> - else
> - page = __hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, gfp_mask,
> - node, nodes_allowed);
> + page = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, node, nodes_allowed);
> if (page)
> break;
> -
> }
>
> if (!page)
> return 0;
>
> - if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> - prep_compound_gigantic_page(page, huge_page_order(h));
> - prep_new_huge_page(h, page, page_to_nid(page));
> put_page(page); /* free it into the hugepage allocator */
>
> return 1;
> @@ -1537,7 +1552,7 @@ int dissolve_free_huge_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> /*
> * Allocates a fresh surplus page from the page allocator.
> */
> -static struct page *__alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> +static struct page *alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> int nid, nodemask_t *nmask)
> {
> struct page *page = NULL;
> @@ -1550,7 +1565,7 @@ static struct page *__alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> goto out_unlock;
> spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>
> - page = __hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nmask);
> + page = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nmask);
> if (!page)
> goto out_unlock;
>
> @@ -1567,16 +1582,8 @@ static struct page *__alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> put_page(page);
> page = NULL;
> } else {
> - int r_nid;
> -
> h->surplus_huge_pages++;
> - h->nr_huge_pages++;
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
> - r_nid = page_to_nid(page);
> - set_compound_page_dtor(page, HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
> - set_hugetlb_cgroup(page, NULL);
> - h->nr_huge_pages_node[r_nid]++;
> - h->surplus_huge_pages_node[r_nid]++;
> + h->nr_huge_pages_node[page_to_nid(page)]++;
> }
>
> out_unlock:
> @@ -1585,7 +1592,7 @@ static struct page *__alloc_surplus_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> return page;
> }
>
> -static struct page *__alloc_migrate_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> +static struct page *alloc_migrate_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> int nid, nodemask_t *nmask)
> {
> struct page *page;
> @@ -1593,7 +1600,7 @@ static struct page *__alloc_migrate_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> return NULL;
>
> - page = __hugetlb_alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nmask);
> + page = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nmask);
> if (!page)
> return NULL;
>
> @@ -1601,7 +1608,6 @@ static struct page *__alloc_migrate_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> * We do not account these pages as surplus because they are only
> * temporary and will be released properly on the last reference
> */
> - prep_new_huge_page(h, page, page_to_nid(page));
> SetPageHugeTemporary(page);
>
> return page;
> @@ -1611,7 +1617,7 @@ static struct page *__alloc_migrate_huge_page(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> * Use the VMA's mpolicy to allocate a huge page from the buddy.
> */
> static
> -struct page *__alloc_buddy_huge_page_with_mpol(struct hstate *h,
> +struct page *alloc_buddy_huge_page_with_mpol(struct hstate *h,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
> {
> struct page *page;
> @@ -1621,7 +1627,7 @@ struct page *__alloc_buddy_huge_page_with_mpol(struct hstate *h,
> nodemask_t *nodemask;
>
> nid = huge_node(vma, addr, gfp_mask, &mpol, &nodemask);
> - page = __alloc_surplus_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
> + page = alloc_surplus_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
> mpol_cond_put(mpol);
>
> return page;
> @@ -1642,7 +1648,7 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page_node(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>
> if (!page)
> - page = __alloc_migrate_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, NULL);
> + page = alloc_migrate_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, NULL);
>
> return page;
> }
> @@ -1665,7 +1671,7 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page_nodemask(struct hstate *h, int preferred_nid,
> }
> spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>
> - return __alloc_migrate_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, preferred_nid, nmask);
> + return alloc_migrate_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, preferred_nid, nmask);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1693,7 +1699,7 @@ static int gather_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h, int delta)
> retry:
> spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> for (i = 0; i < needed; i++) {
> - page = __alloc_surplus_huge_page(h, htlb_alloc_mask(h),
> + page = alloc_surplus_huge_page(h, htlb_alloc_mask(h),
> NUMA_NO_NODE, NULL);
> if (!page) {
> alloc_ok = false;
> @@ -2030,7 +2036,7 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> page = dequeue_huge_page_vma(h, vma, addr, avoid_reserve, gbl_chg);
> if (!page) {
> spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> - page = __alloc_buddy_huge_page_with_mpol(h, vma, addr);
> + page = alloc_buddy_huge_page_with_mpol(h, vma, addr);
> if (!page)
> goto out_uncharge_cgroup;
> if (!avoid_reserve && vma_has_reserves(vma, gbl_chg)) {
> @@ -2170,7 +2176,7 @@ static void __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages(struct hstate *h)
> if (hstate_is_gigantic(h)) {
> if (!alloc_bootmem_huge_page(h))
> break;
> - } else if (!alloc_fresh_huge_page(h,
> + } else if (!alloc_pool_huge_page(h,
> &node_states[N_MEMORY]))
> break;
> cond_resched();
> @@ -2290,7 +2296,7 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
> * First take pages out of surplus state. Then make up the
> * remaining difference by allocating fresh huge pages.
> *
> - * We might race with __alloc_surplus_huge_page() here and be unable
> + * We might race with alloc_surplus_huge_page() here and be unable
> * to convert a surplus huge page to a normal huge page. That is
> * not critical, though, it just means the overall size of the
> * pool might be one hugepage larger than it needs to be, but
> @@ -2313,7 +2319,7 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
> /* yield cpu to avoid soft lockup */
> cond_resched();
>
> - ret = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed);
> + ret = alloc_pool_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed);
> spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> if (!ret)
> goto out;
> @@ -2333,7 +2339,7 @@ static unsigned long set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
> * By placing pages into the surplus state independent of the
> * overcommit value, we are allowing the surplus pool size to
> * exceed overcommit. There are few sane options here. Since
> - * __alloc_surplus_huge_page() is checking the global counter,
> + * alloc_surplus_huge_page() is checking the global counter,
> * though, we'll note that we're not allowed to exceed surplus
> * and won't grow the pool anywhere else. Not until one of the
> * sysctls are changed, or the surplus pages go out of use.
> --
> 2.15.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists