[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180222070904.548-9-boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:08:55 +0800
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC tip/locking/lockdep v5 08/17] lockdep: Fix recursive read lock related safe->unsafe detection
There are four cases for recursive read lock realted deadlocks:
(--(X..Y)--> means a strong dependency path starts with a --(X*)-->
dependency and ends with a --(*Y)-- dependency.)
1. An irq-safe lock L1 has a dependency --(*..*)--> to an
irq-unsafe lock L2.
2. An irq-read-safe lock L1 has a dependency --(N..*)--> to an
irq-unsafe lock L2.
3. An irq-safe lock L1 has a dependency --(*..N)--> to an
irq-read-unsafe lock L2.
4. An irq-read-safe lock L1 has a dependency --(N..N)--> to an
irq-read-unsafe lock L2.
The current check_usage() only checks 1) and 2), so this patch adds
checks for 3) and 4) and makes sure when find_usage_{back,for}wards find
an irq-read-{,un}safe lock, the traverse path should ends at a
dependency --(*N)-->. Note when we search backwards, --(*N)--> indicates
a real dependency --(N*)-->.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 0b0ad3db78b4..bd3eef664f9d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1504,7 +1504,14 @@ check_redundant(struct lock_list *root, struct held_lock *target,
static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit)
{
- return entry->class->usage_mask & (1 << (enum lock_usage_bit)bit);
+ enum lock_usage_bit ub = (enum lock_usage_bit)bit;
+
+
+ if (ub & 1)
+ return entry->class->usage_mask & (1 << ub) &&
+ !entry->is_rr;
+ else
+ return entry->class->usage_mask & (1 << ub);
}
@@ -1815,6 +1822,10 @@ static int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
exclusive_bit(bit), state_name(bit)))
return 0;
+ if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, bit,
+ exclusive_bit(bit) + 1, state_name(bit)))
+ return 0;
+
bit++; /* _READ */
/*
@@ -1827,6 +1838,10 @@ static int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
exclusive_bit(bit), state_name(bit)))
return 0;
+ if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, bit,
+ exclusive_bit(bit) + 1, state_name(bit)))
+ return 0;
+
return 1;
}
--
2.16.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists