lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <465a2ca7-9f74-8977-37ea-29fe3944c27c@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:03:42 +0000
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>,
        Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, rohkumar@....qualcomm.com,
        spatakok@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/25] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: Add bindings for APR bus



On 22/02/18 00:14, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 3:33 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla
> <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Thanks for your review comments,
>>
>>
>> On 18/02/18 23:04, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 09:13:23AM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the review,
>>>>
>>>> On 13/02/18 23:12, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 04:58:13PM +0000, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch add dt bindings for Qualcomm APR (Asynchronous Packet
>>>>>> Router)
>>>>>> bus driver. This bus is used for communicating with DSP which provides
>>>>>> audio and various other services to cpu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     .../devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,apr.txt      | 83
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
>>>>>>     create mode 100644
>>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,apr.txt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,apr.txt
>>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,apr.txt
>>>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>>>> index 000000000000..1b95fbfed348
>>>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,apr.txt
>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
>>>>>> +Qualcomm APR (Asynchronous Packet Router) binding
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +This binding describes the Qualcomm APR. APR is a IPC protocol for
>>>>>> +communication between Application processor and QDSP. APR is mainly
>>>>>> +used for audio/voice services on the QDSP.
>>>>>> +
...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not a good design generally to mix different types of nodes at one
>>>>> level.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree, may be I can split the services and devices into different
>>>> subnodes
>>>> like below, which should avoid mixing different types of nodes.
>>>>
>>>> Does this sound good to you?
>>>
>>>
>>> Seems your original example wasn't so complete...
>>>
>> Yep, I will fix it in next version.
>>>
>>> I don't see why you need all these nodes in the first place. For a
>>> single SoC, how much does all this vary?
>>>
>> It might not vary for a given SoC, but It does vary across the SoCs.
>> Also the versions of each service are independent to each other.
> 
> Not sure I follow the last statement. Meaning firmware updates change
> the services?
Sorry for not being clear, so the services like AFE, ASM, ADM have 
different version numbers for a given SoC/firmware.

Not 100% sure if firmware updates would change the service version 
number, even if it does, it can be queried dynamically on new B family 
SoCs, and on older A Family SoCs I have not seen the firmware updates in 
last 4 years.

> I don't see any versioning of services here.

Yes, Plan is that it will be part of the compatible string in cases 
where version query is not supported on older QCOM A family SoCs.
On B Family SoCs we can query the version dynamically.

> 
>>
>>>>
>>>> apr {
>>>>           compatible = "qcom,apr-v2";
>>>>           qcom,smd-channels = "apr_audio_svc";
>>>>           qcom,apr-dest-domain-id = <APR_DOMAIN_ADSP>;
>>>>
>>>>           apr-services {
>>>>                   q6core {
>>>>                           qcom,apr-svc-name = "CORE";
>>>>                           qcom,apr-svc-id = <APR_SVC_ADSP_CORE>;
>>>>                           compatible = "qcom,q6core";
>>>>                   };
>>>>
>>>>                   q6afe: q6afe {
>>>>                           compatible = "qcom,q6afe";
>>>>                           qcom,apr-svc-name = "AFE";
>>>>                           qcom,apr-svc-id = <APR_SVC_AFE>;
>>>>                           #sound-dai-cells = <1>;
>>>>                   };
>>>>
>>>>                   q6asm: q6asm {
>>>>                           compatible = "qcom,q6asm";
>>>>                           qcom,apr-svc-name = "ASM";
>>>>                           qcom,apr-svc-id = <APR_SVC_ASM>;
>>>>                           #sound-dai-cells = <1>;
>>>>                   };
>>>>
>>>>                   q6adm: q6adm {
>>>>                           compatible = "qcom,q6adm";
>>>>                           qcom,apr-svc-name = "ADM";
>>>>                           qcom,apr-svc-id = <APR_SVC_ADM>;
>>>>                           #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
>>>>                   };
>>>
>>>
>>> All these DAI nodes could be a single node and the cell value be the
>>> svc-id?
>>
So we will have 2 cell values, one representing the apr service and 
other the dai.

>> No, DAI's here are both backends and frontends, and some of the services
>> like core, USM are not DAI's
>>
>> Are you also saying that we should have a single driver entity for all these
>> services?
> 
> DT nodes do not equate driver entities. A driver can instantiate other drivers.
> 
> Am I saying a single DT node for this? Yes, perhaps.
Yes, I will give that a go.

So we will endup having something like this in DT for one frontend and 
backend dailink:

apr {
	compatible = "qcom,apr-v2";
	qcom,smd-channels = "apr_audio_svc";
	qcom,apr-dest-domain-id = <APR_DOMAIN_ADSP>

	q6audio: audiosvc {
		compatible = "qcom,q6audio-svc";
		qcom,apr-svcs = <APR_SVC_CORE APR_SVC_AFE APR_SVC_ASM>;
		qcom,apr-svc-names = "CORE", "AFE", "ASM";
	};

	sndcard {
		compatible = "qcom,msm8996-snd-card"
		qcom,model = "DB820c";
		qcom,audio-routing =
                 	"RX_BIAS", "MCLK";
		fe@1 {
                 	is-fe;
                         link-name = "MultiMedia1";
                         cpu {
                         	sound-dai = <&q6audio  APR_SVC_ASM MM1>	
			};
                         platform {
                         	sound-dai = <&q6audio APR_SVC_ASM MM1>;
                         };
                  };

		be@1 {
                 	link-name = "HDMI Playback";
			cpu {
                         	sound-dai = <&q6audio APR_SVC_AFE HDMI>;
                         };

                         platform {
	                        sound-dai = <&q6audio ARP_SVC_ADM>;
                         };

                         codec {
                         	sound-dai = <&hdmi 0>;
			};
             	};
	};
};	

Thanks,
Srini

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ