[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180222122603.dv4ipqxwmg3bfyoo@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:26:03 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: arm_spe: include linux/vmalloc.h for vmap()
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:47:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On linux-next, I get a build failure in some configurations:
>
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c: In function 'arm_spe_pmu_setup_aux':
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:857:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'vmap'; did you mean 'swap'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> buf->base = vmap(pglist, nr_pages, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
> ^~~~
> swap
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:857:37: error: 'VM_MAP' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'VM_MPX'?
> buf->base = vmap(pglist, nr_pages, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
> ^~~~~~
> VM_MPX
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:857:37: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c: In function 'arm_spe_pmu_free_aux':
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:878:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'vunmap'; did you mean 'iounmap'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> vmap() is declared in linux/vmalloc.h, so we should include that header file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> I have not bisected what caused this problem, presumably some other
> header stopped including vmlinux.h.
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index 51b40aecb776..f90672516ada 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
This looks good. From a quick look, we're also missing explicit includes
for:
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/printk.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <asm/barrier.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/mmu.h>
... which would be worth sorting out at teh same time.
Will, are you happy to fold those in? Assuming so:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists