linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: arm_spe: include linux/vmalloc.h for vmap()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:26:03 +0000
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: arm_spe: include linux/vmalloc.h for vmap()

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:47:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On linux-next, I get a build failure in some configurations:
> 
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c: In function 'arm_spe_pmu_setup_aux':
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:857:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'vmap'; did you mean 'swap'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   buf->base = vmap(pglist, nr_pages, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
>               ^~~~
>               swap
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:857:37: error: 'VM_MAP' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'VM_MPX'?
>   buf->base = vmap(pglist, nr_pages, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
>                                      ^~~~~~
>                                      VM_MPX
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:857:37: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c: In function 'arm_spe_pmu_free_aux':
> drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c:878:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'vunmap'; did you mean 'iounmap'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> vmap() is declared in linux/vmalloc.h, so we should include that header file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> I have not bisected what caused this problem, presumably some other
> header stopped including vmlinux.h.
> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index 51b40aecb776..f90672516ada 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>

This looks good. From a quick look, we're also missing explicit includes
for:

#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/printk.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>

#include <asm/barrier.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/mmu.h>

... which would be worth sorting out at teh same time.

Will, are you happy to fold those in? Assuming so:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>

Mark.