[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2093598.TLbMltDcSo@blindfold>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:30:09 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel23498@...il.com>
Cc: boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
computersforpeace@...il.com, marek.vasut@...il.com,
cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr, maximlevitsky@...il.com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar, outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH NAND v3] mtd: nand: Replace printk() with appropriate pr_*() macro
Am Donnerstag, 22. Februar 2018, 14:10:14 CET schrieb Shreeya Patel:
> @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static void __init doc2000_count_chips(struct mtd_info
> *mtd) break;
> }
> doc->chips_per_floor = i;
> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "Detected %d chips per floor.\n", i);
> + pr_debug("Detected %d chips per floor.\n", i);
<bike-shedding>
You are aware of the fact that printk(KERN_DEBUG and pr_debug() are not
equivalent?
Not a big deal, just want to make sure that you understand what you are doing.
:-)
</bike-shedding>
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists