[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY7JGmHO_oC6__+6+5ukJsThqq6Oy5u0+En01=DAN2owQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:13:01 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Cc: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Change ISA_BUS_API dependency to selection
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:22 AM, William Breathitt Gray
<vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:29:30AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 9:13 PM, William Breathitt Gray
>><vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Linus, please pickup this entire patchset through your GPIO subsystem
>>> tree; a recursive dependency error is present if these patches are
>>> cherry-picked (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/26/235), so they should
>>> be merged together in the same tree.
>>
>>OK I just need a bunch of ACKs so giving subsystem maintainers some
>>days to come back on this.
>>
>>Yours,
>>Linus Walleij
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> Do you have any objections to picking up this patchset now; or would you
> prefer to wait for some more input from the other maintainers?
No I will try to apply it and see what happens :)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists