[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaw75RH_WR4Ta9AmqNmGnaPhFKK2HfC=m8SNabACs95vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:16:17 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Cc: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] gpio: Change ISA_BUS_API dependency to selection
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 9:13 PM, William Breathitt Gray
<vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:
> The ISA_BUS_API Kconfig option enables the compilation of the ISA bus
> driver. The ISA bus driver does not perform any hardware interaction,
> and is instead just a thin layer of software abstraction to eliminate
> boilerplate code common to ISA-style device drivers. Since ISA_BUS_API
> has no dependencies and does not jeopardize the integrity of the system
> when enabled, drivers should select it when the ISA bus driver
> functionality is needed.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Patch applied to the GPIO tree for v4.17.
Can you confirm that we don't have any dangling ISA
drivers not using this?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists