lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:22:44 +0000
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        kvmarm <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Philip Elcan <pelcan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: Add support for new control bits CTR_EL0.DIC
 and CTR_EL0.IDC

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 08:51:30AM -0600, Shanker Donthineni wrote:
> +#define CTR_B31_SHIFT		31

Since this is just a RES1 bit, I think we don't need a mnemonic for it,
but I'll defer to Will and Catalin on that.

>  ENTRY(invalidate_icache_range)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SKIP_CACHE_POU
> +alternative_if ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC
> +	mov	x0, xzr
> +	dsb	ishst
> +	isb
> +	ret
> +alternative_else_nop_endif
> +#endif

As commented on v3, I don't believe you need the DSB here. If prior
stores haven't been completed at this point, the existing implementation
would not work correctly here.

Otherwise, this looks ok to me.

Thanks,
Mark.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ