[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180222164432.0f2b1e56@bbrezillon>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:44:32 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel23498@...il.com>
Cc: boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, richard@....at,
dwmw2@...radead.org, computersforpeace@...il.com,
marek.vasut@...il.com, cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr,
maximlevitsky@...il.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar,
outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH NAND v4] mtd: nand: Replace printk() with appropriate
pr_*() macro
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:59:27 +0530
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel23498@...il.com> wrote:
> The log levels embedded with the name are more concise than
> printk.
If you don't mind, I'll replace the above sentence by:
"
Using pr_<loglevel>() is more concise than printk(KERN_<LOGLEVEL>).
"
The patch looks good otherwise, so I should apply it soon.
If you're okay, and Julia and Ezequiel are okay too, I'd like to move
to the next step and have you work on an ->exec_op() conversion
(jz4780?).
Of course, that does not prevent you from continuing the
printk()/dev_xx() conversion.
--
Boris Brezillon, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists