[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180222104024.60408a75@lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:40:24 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: process: Add "Root-caused-by" and "Suggested-by"
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:37:50 -0800
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> As recently pointed out by Linus, "Root-caused-by" is a good tag to include
> since it can indicate significantly more work than "just" a Reported-by.
> This adds it and "Suggested-by" (which was also missing) to the documented
> list of tags. Additionally updates checkpatch.pl to match the process docs.
So I'm not really opposed to this, but I do wonder if we really need to
make a catalog of all the tags that might appear. A quick grep turns up
stuff like:
Niced-by
Based-on-a-patch-by
Debugged-by
Requested-by
Despised-by
Improvements-by
Tracked-by
Analyzed-by
Bisected-by
Okay-ished-by
\o/-by
Pointed-at-by
Brown-paper-bag-to-be-worn-by
Not-longer-ranted-at-by
Rightfully-ranted-at-by
Helped-by
Architected-by
Also-posted-by
Complained-about-by
Mehed-by
Reminded-by
Actually-written-by
Generated-by
Historical-research-by
Some of these are arguably more useful than others, but I'm not sure we
want to bother documenting even an often-used subset of them.
That said, we can add this one; I'll take the patch if I get an ack from
Joe.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists