[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da0c7692-1068-11be-a388-f9fc0d17ec27@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:11:16 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH fixes v3] pinctrl: Really force states during
suspend/resume
Hi Linus,
On 22/02/18 15:30, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> wrote:
>>> Am Montag, 19. Februar 2018, 19:03:27 CET schrieb Florian Fainelli:
>
>>>> Can you indicate which DTS file is used for your Chromebook model? Sorry about the breakage.
>>>
>>> that should be
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-kevin.dts
>>>
>>> I'm vacationing right now, so don't think I'll find time to dive into
>>> Rockchip pinctrl this week. But I'd guess it could be somehow
>>> related to the ATF touching pins during suspend/resume?
>>
>> That'd be really unfortunate. I would have assumed that ATF would
>> leave things as they were instead of re-configuring them to whatever
>> default.
>>
>> The most annoying thing is that if that's indeed the case, we need to
>> find a solution that will cope with the current state of the
>> firmware. I guess that'd mean eagerly saving/restoring the pin state
>> across suspend/resume, irrespective of what firmware could do?
>
> What is ATF? Asus Touch Firmware?
More like "ARM Trusted Firmware", aka the firmware that runs on the
secure side of most 64bit ARM systems.
> Does it in effect mean that when the Rockchip pinctrl driver
> says pinctrl_force_sleep() and pinctrl_force_default()
> it expects those to be a noop?
>
> Then the real patch to apply is something deleting the
> pinctrl_force* calls from the pinctrl-rockchip driver,
> is it not?
Quite possibly. Unravelling this bit of code, I came to a similar
conclusion. The question is then: what is this call supposed to be used
for? I'm pretty sure it is not completely gratuitous, but it makes no
sense on my platform.
I'll give it a go later today.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists