[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <151933737388.16436.11922095105762928334.stgit@noble>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:09:33 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] staging: lustre: lnet/selftest: don't ignore status
from lstcon_test_add
If lstcon_test_add sets 'ret' (passed by reference) to 1,
then lst_test_add_ioctl() ignores the return value.
This isn't justified - the return value must be zero for 'ret'
to be meaningful.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conctl.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conctl.c
index 51497cf9a832..a2d8092bdeb7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conctl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/selftest/conctl.c
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static int lst_test_add_ioctl(struct lstio_test_args *args)
args->lstio_tes_param_len,
&ret, args->lstio_tes_resultp);
- if (ret)
+ if (!rc && ret)
rc = (copy_to_user(args->lstio_tes_retp, &ret,
sizeof(ret))) ? -EFAULT : 0;
out:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists