lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180222225752.GA3670@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:57:52 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Bad PTEs in page tables


We've got a few reports now [1] from users who are seeing a NULL pointer
dereference in the radix tree code.  I've tracked it down to bad PTEs.
I don't think it's been seen on 64-bit x86, but it's definitely been
seen on 32-bit x86 running under Xen.

Feb  9 14:31:27 cs01 kernel: Bad swp_entry: 2000000
Feb  9 14:31:27 cs01 kernel: mm/swap_state.c:683: bad pte
ef3a3f38(8000000100000000)

Feb  9 15:35:19 cs01 kernel: Bad swp_entry: 2000000
Feb  9 15:35:19 cs01 kernel: mm/swap_state.c:683: bad pte
eee17f38(8000000100000000)

(I also have a report from an earlier version of the patch with a Bad
swp_entry of 0e000000, so it's not a simple bit-flip like I had been
hoping)

At this point, I think it's out of my realm of expertise.  Anyone else
got a good idea why bits 63 & 32 would be set in a PTE?  I know 63 is
the XD bit, but bit 32 isn't special in a present PTE.

[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531779
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198497

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ