[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1519414328.30443.29.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:32:08 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@...il.com>,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, linux-metag@...r.kernel.org,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support
On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 18:19 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
[...]
> IIRC, parisc/qemu stuff had been announced a while ago;
I have, but it didn't work sufficiently for me to either boot a kernel
using system emulation or start an architecture container using user
emulation. I'll try again now that qemu has gone through several
revisions.
> I hadn't tried that yet (got an old parisc box, so 32bit testing can
> be done on that).
The mailing list (linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org) does regular build
testing on a variety of 32 and 64 bit hardware.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists