linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 007/145] xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read on socket policy lookup.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180223170725.656716347@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 19:25:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 007/145] xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read on socket policy lookup.

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>

commit ddc47e4404b58f03e98345398fb12d38fe291512 upstream.

When we do tunnel or beet mode, we pass saddr and daddr from the
template to xfrm_state_find(), this is ok. On transport mode,
we pass the addresses from the flowi, assuming that the IP
addresses (and address family) don't change during transformation.
This assumption is wrong in the IPv4 mapped IPv6 case, packet
is IPv4 and template is IPv6.

Fix this by catching address family missmatches of the policy
and the flow already before we do the lookup.

Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1257,9 +1257,15 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_polic
  again:
 	pol = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_policy[dir]);
 	if (pol != NULL) {
-		bool match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl, family);
+		bool match;
 		int err = 0;
 
+		if (pol->family != family) {
+			pol = NULL;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
+		match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl, family);
 		if (match) {
 			if ((sk->sk_mark & pol->mark.m) != pol->mark.v) {
 				pol = NULL;