[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWj1v6WmfLY5JttZ+LMpSn2XvjgBS95Ag9TBohRRU1qTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:06:11 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
jacopo mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/19] ARM64: dts: r8a77965: Add EtherAVB device node
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:53:58PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> On 02/21/2018 09:23 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
>>
>> > ...
>> >
>> >>>>>>>> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 812>;
>> >>>>>>>> + power-domains = <&sysc 32>;
>> >>>>>>>> + resets = <&cpg 812>;
>> >>>>>>>> + phy-mode = "rgmii-txid";
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Why not just "rgmii"? TX delay is a board specific detail, no?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I admit I took this one straight from r8a7796 dtsi.
>> >>>>>> Would you like to me resend and change this?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Yes, unless Simon would fix it while merging...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Can I confirm the desired change is s/rgmii-txid/rgmii/ ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes.
>> >>
>> >> Apparently that means that this prop should be overridden in the board file
>> >> (which may not be an easy task given the board is Salvator-XS again).
>> >>
>> >> [...]
>> >
>> > Can we override it in r8a77965-salvator-x.dts or r8a77965-salvator-xs.dts?
>>
>> In salvator-common.dtsi most probably -- it has the PHY data for Ether AVB.
>>
>> > I feel that I'm missing an important point here.
>>
>> Well, r8a779{5|6}.dtsi also have phy-mode = "rgmii-txid" (which was
>> unjustified in my current understanding). Thus such board override
>> wouldn't hurt them. But we lack a patch modifying salvator-common.dtsi
>> in htis series, so I'm now thinking a respin of this series is needed
>> anyway... sorry for being unclear. :-)
>
> While I've applied other patches in this series I have
> not applied this one - mainly to allow this discussion to conclude.
>
> Is an appropriate solution to do the following?
>
> 1) Atomically update
> a) r8a779{5|6}.dtsi to use "rgmii" and
> b) salvator-common.dtsi to use "rgmii-txid"
> 2) Update this patch to use "rgmii"
No need for atomics.
It can all be done by patches touching single files only:
1) Add "rgmii-txid" to board .dts(i) files,
2) Change s/rgmii-txid/rgmii/ in SoC .dtsi files.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists