lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:46:50 -0800
From:   Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:     Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, will.deacon@....com,
        robh@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
        leo.yan@...aro.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, avilaj@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 8/8] perf: ARM DynamIQ Shared Unit PMU support

On 02/23/2018 03:35 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:38:39PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>> On 02/22/2018 03:33 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:32:46PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>>>> I'm not exactly sure if we can add entries to perf_type_id. If that's
>>>> allowed maybe we need to add something line PERF_TYPE_DSU and use that?
>>>>
>>>> Or if that's not allowed then would it be better to offset the DSU PMU
>>>> events by some number (say 0x1000) and then delete the event type check or
>>>> pass PERF_TYPE_RAW to perf_pmu_register()?
>>>
>>> As above, neither of these should be necessary.
>>
>> For the userspace interface. How about the kernel interface though?
>> perf_event_create_kernel_counter() takes attr.type as an input. But there's
>> no way to look up the DSU PMU's "type".
>
> There is no lookup mechanism currently.
>
> I take it you want to use DSU events from a kernel module?

Yes

>
> It would be possible to have a simlar name -> type lookup mechanism
> kernel-side, if necessary.

Yeah, this is what I was thinking once you explained how user space 
handles this. Just wanted to hear it from this thread. I can submit a patch.

Thanks,
Saravana

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ