[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3916c49d-f74a-97a0-9240-de9a727bece9@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:32:05 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Joel Fernandes <joelf@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto: omap: Improve a size determination in three
functions
>> @@ -1032,14 +1032,13 @@ static int omap_aes_get_res_pdev(struct omap_aes_dev *dd,
>> static int omap_aes_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> - struct omap_aes_dev *dd;
>> struct crypto_alg *algp;
>> struct aead_alg *aalg;
>> struct resource res;
>> int err = -ENOMEM, i, j, irq = -1;
>> u32 reg;
>> + struct omap_aes_dev *dd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dd), GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>> - dd = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct omap_aes_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> I'm fine with sizeof(*dd)
Thanks for your feedback.
> but please don't combine the allocation with the declaration.
Why do you not like such an implementation detail?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists