[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180223080701.GB1584@amd>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:07:01 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: whiteheadm@....org
Cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What was last kernel that booted on hardware XY? database was
Re: [BUG] x86 : i486 reporting to be vulnerable to
Meltdown/Spectre_V1/Spectre_V2A
Hi!
> >> > BTW... I'd really like to have a database of machine, kernel version,
> >> > cpuinfo, config... So that questions like "what is the latest kernel
> >> > that is known to be running on this hardware" and "what config should
> >> > I start from".
> >> >
> >> > For example, I have nokia N810 here. It was supported by Linux at some
> >> > point, but then we moved to dts, and stuff changed, and I can no
> >> > longer figure how to boot it.
> >> >
> >> > I guess "what was last kernel that worked on Cyrix MII" is also
> >> > relevant question.
> >> >
> >> > Is there such database? If not, would people be interested in
> >> > contributing if I create one?
> >> >
> >>
> >> I am interested and will help. I have i486/i586/Pentium Pro/Pentium
> >> II/Pentium II Xeon/Pentium 4 systems to test on. Oddly, I don't yet
> >> have Pentium III systems.
> >>
> >> I think an associated goal would be to fix those broken versions.
> >>
> >> I think this is a great project for college students to get experience
> >> with. Who else is interested?
> >
> > Ok, I started something:
> >
> > https://github.com/pavelmachek/missy
> >
> This is a good start. Could we start to create a hierarchy of major
> architectures next? I propose the following:
For desktop PCs, I guess grouping by CPU type makes sense. But I guess
I'd prefer grouping CPUs by manufacturer, not by CPU "family".
So I'd propose
pc/intel/i486
pc/cyrix/cx486
pc/amd/am486
...
> You would put the computer you tested it on inside one of these directories.
>
> This will need to be edited if you choose to use it. I left out items
> I know little about, such as Geode GX1, Geode LX, VIA C3-2, VIA C7,
> Transmeta Crusoe and Efficeon, Winchip-2, Winchip-C6, and certainly
> others.
Advantage is, that even if you know little about the chip, you know
who manufactured it and how it is called :-).
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists