[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve5b+pV78xU0DHi9644GT11gwe6sqzqrj_4xRjHHM5yRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:09:41 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@...il.com>,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, linux-metag@...r.kernel.org,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> some of the even older architectures (parisc, alpha, m68k, ia64)
> that people maintain mainly for fun.
alpha is not only for fun but for seeing how out of order can screw up
the "working" code.
ia64 as far as I *heard* from some news will be in support (I mean by
vendors) for few more years. Not a fun, just business.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists