[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdVAkgpdUJKedLq24tbN-GbUgJEz9E7f0fyj=tW3TtBRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:13:41 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] reset: add support for non-DT systems
2018-02-23 12:39 GMT+01:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> The reset framework only supports device-tree. There are some platforms
> however, which need to use it even in legacy, board-file based mode.
>
> An example of such architecture is the DaVinci family of SoCs which
> supports both device tree and legacy boot modes and we don't want to
> introduce any regressions.
>
> We're currently working on converting the platform from its hand-crafted
> clock API to using the common clock framework. Part of the overhaul will
> be representing the chip's power sleep controller's reset lines using
> the reset framework.
>
> This changeset extends the core reset code with a new reset lookup
> entry structure. It contains data allowing the reset core to associate
> reset lines with devices by comparing the dev_id and con_id strings.
>
> It also provides a function allowing drivers to register lookup entries
> with the framework.
>
> The new lookup function is only called as a fallback in case the
> of_node field is NULL and doesn't change anything for current users.
>
> Tested with a dummy reset driver with several lookup entries.
>
> An example lookup table registration from a driver can be found below:
>
> static struct reset_control_lookup foobar_reset_lookup[] = {
> RESET_LOOKUP("foo.0", "foo", 15),
> RESET_LOOKUP("bar.0", NULL, 5),
> };
>
> foobar_probe()
> {
> ...
>
> reset_controller_add_lookup(&rcdev, foobar_reset_lookup,
> ARRAY_SIZE(foobar_reset_lookup));
>
> ...
> }
>
> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
> Cc: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - renamed the new function to __reset_control_get_from_lookup()
> - added a missing break; when a matching entry is found
> - rearranged the code in __reset_control_get() - we can no longer get to the
> return at the bottom, so remove it and return from
> __reset_control_get_from_lookup() if __of_reset_control_get() fails
> - return -ENOENT from reset_contol_get() if we can't find a matching entry,
> prevously returned -EINVAL referred to the fact that we passed a device
> without the of_node which is no longer an error condition
> - add a comment about needing a sentinel in the lookup table
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - added the reset id number field to the lookup struct so that we don't need
> to rely on the array index
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - separated the driver and lookup table registration logic by adding a
> function meant to be called by machine-specific code that adds a lookup
> table to the internal list
> - the correct reset controller is now found by first finding the lookup
> table associated with it, then finding the actual reset controller by
> the associated device
>
> v4 -> v5:
> - since the first user of this will be the davinci clk driver and it
> already registers clock lookup from within the driver code - allow
> drivers to register lookups with the assumption that the code can be
> extended to make it possible to register entries from machine code as
> well
> - simplify the code - only expose a single lookup structure and a simply
> registration function
> - add the RESET_LOOKUP macro for brevity
>
> drivers/reset/core.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/reset-controller.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Also: I decided not to go the phy way of allocating memory dynamically
for lookup entries - I believe this is overkill and makes the code
more complicated with all the error checking required.
Instead, the lookup entries structs should be provided by the caller.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists