lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ba335af-3fc5-2afd-8c52-03dca5eba9a4@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 22:19:42 +0800
From:   Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Joachim Eastwood <manabian@...il.com>, dinguyen@...nel.org,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        "xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] mmc: dw_mmc: remove the deprecated
 "clock-freq-min-max" property

Hi Andy,

On 2018/2/23 21:27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 8:41 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> wrote:
>> 'clock-freq-min-max' property had already deprecated.
>> Remove the 'clock-freq-min-max' property that is kept to maintain
>> the compatibility.
> 
> Removing a property without telling the user what to expect is a bad
> idea and ABI breakage.
> 

What's the general process to remove a property?

I guess we should do:
1) deprecate it in the first place and remove it from all upstream DT
2) wait some long enough days for expecting the stale of all old DTB
containing that property
3) remove the functionality of the deprecated property from the driver
but still leave some warning there
4) remove the left warning finally

And for the ABI breakage, we should add something in Documentation/ABI
/obsolete  or Documentation/ABI/removed ?

-- 
Best Regards
Shawn Lin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ