linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/xen-front: Implement Xen event channel handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7d8ab151-e90d-baef-93b6-8ca1c7e42908@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:44:43 -0500
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Oleksandr Andrushchenko <andr2000@...il.com>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, airlied@...ux.ie,
        daniel.vetter@...el.com, seanpaul@...omium.org,
        gustavo@...ovan.org, jgross@...e.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Cc:     Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@...m.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/xen-front: Implement Xen event channel handling

On 02/23/2018 02:00 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> On 02/23/2018 01:50 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 02/21/2018 03:03 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>>> +
>>> +static irqreturn_t evtchnl_interrupt_ctrl(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct xen_drm_front_evtchnl *evtchnl = dev_id;
>>> +    struct xen_drm_front_info *front_info = evtchnl->front_info;
>>> +    struct xendispl_resp *resp;
>>> +    RING_IDX i, rp;
>>> +    unsigned long flags;
>>> +
>>> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&front_info->io_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> +    if (unlikely(evtchnl->state != EVTCHNL_STATE_CONNECTED))
>>> +        goto out;
>> Do you need to check the state under lock? (in other routines too).
> not really, will move out of the lock in interrupt handlers
> other places (I assume you refer to be_stream_do_io)


I was mostly referring to evtchnl_interrupt_evt().

-boris


> it is set under lock as a part of atomic operation, e.g.
> we get a new request pointer from the ring and reset completion
> So, those places still seem to be ok