[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3-NTzY3x5xM_d8Bxm-s+SF0L8d60vd-FOHccVxXo_AVg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:19:01 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpio: winbond: fix ISA_BUS_API dependency"
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
<mail@...iej.szmigiero.name> wrote:
> This reverts commit 92a8046c9d952a2a7d21dfcd3afadc72a0bc0f72.
>
> Now that the patch series changing ISA_BUS_API dependency to selection
> was merged this reversion will do the same for gpio-winbond driver to
> make it consistent with other ISA bus gpio drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
I still see a number of other users of 'depends on ISA_BUS_API' in linux-next:
drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && ISA_BUS_API
drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && ISA_BUS_API
drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && ISA_BUS_API
drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && ISA_BUS_API
drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on ISA_BUS_API
drivers/gpio/Kconfig: depends on ISA_BUS_API
drivers/iio/adc/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && X86 && ISA_BUS_API
drivers/iio/counter/Kconfig: depends on PC104 && X86 && ISA_BUS_API
drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig: depends on X86 && ISA_BUS_API
drivers/watchdog/Kconfig: depends on X86 && ISA_BUS_API
Did you change all of the above? I would really like to avoid mixing
'select' and 'depends on' here, as that will likely cause other circular
dependencies in the future.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists