[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180223024320.GA321@shlinux2>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:43:20 +0800
From: Peng Fan <van.freenix@...il.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: jens.wiklander@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tee: correct max value for id allocation
Hi Jens,
Any comments on this patch?
Thanks,
Peng
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 05:27:35PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
>The privileged dev id range is [TEE_NUM_DEVICES / 2, TEE_NUM_DEVICES).
>The non-privileged dev id range is [0, TEE_NUM_DEVICES / 2).
>
>So when finding a slot for them, need to use different max value.
>
>Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
>---
> drivers/tee/tee_core.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
>index 3d49ac2e3c84..d1f4ecdbc8cc 100644
>--- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
>+++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
>@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@ struct tee_device *tee_device_alloc(const struct tee_desc *teedesc,
> {
> struct tee_device *teedev;
> void *ret;
>- int rc;
>+ int rc, max_id;
> int offs = 0;
>
> if (!teedesc || !teedesc->name || !teedesc->ops ||
>@@ -715,16 +715,20 @@ struct tee_device *tee_device_alloc(const struct tee_desc *teedesc,
> goto err;
> }
>
>- if (teedesc->flags & TEE_DESC_PRIVILEGED)
>+ max_id = TEE_NUM_DEVICES / 2;
>+
>+ if (teedesc->flags & TEE_DESC_PRIVILEGED) {
> offs = TEE_NUM_DEVICES / 2;
>+ max_id = TEE_NUM_DEVICES;
>+ }
>
> spin_lock(&driver_lock);
>- teedev->id = find_next_zero_bit(dev_mask, TEE_NUM_DEVICES, offs);
>- if (teedev->id < TEE_NUM_DEVICES)
>+ teedev->id = find_next_zero_bit(dev_mask, max_id, offs);
>+ if (teedev->id < max_id)
> set_bit(teedev->id, dev_mask);
> spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
>
>- if (teedev->id >= TEE_NUM_DEVICES) {
>+ if (teedev->id >= max_id) {
> ret = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> goto err;
> }
>--
>2.14.1
>
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists