linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update ASPEED entry with details

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:41:07 +1030
From:   Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
To:     "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update ASPEED entry with details

Hi Haiyue,

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Wang, Haiyue wrote:
> Dear Andrew & Joel,
> 
> Since you are ASPEED BMC experts, any time and interest in eSPI code 
> review ? I've sent
> 
> it before, but no more response. Intel recommends eSPI bus than LPC as I 
> know. I just kept
> 
> the minimal eSPI code which is approved to work well in our real server 
> boards for two more
> 
> years. Other part of eSPI driver from ASPEED's SDK  has been removed, 
> because ePSI is a new
> 
> thing, we only use a small feature set like booting host.
> 
> We Intel submit this eSPI patch for openbmc upstreaming, hope for your 
> response. :-)
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10166577/
> 

There are some comments against the v1 that you linked to above, is there a v2 on the lists?

Separately it's better to ping us by replying to the patch itself and putting us in To/Cc, that way we keep discussions focused on the patch at hand here.

Cheers,

Andrew