lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:54:35 +0530 From: poza@...eaurora.org To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, Wei Zhang <wzhang@...com>, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>, Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/7] PCI/AER: Rename error recovery to generic pci naming On 2018-02-23 00:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 09:32:06PM +0530, Oza Pawandeep wrote: >> This patch renames error recovery to generic name with pci prefix >> >> Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <poza@...eaurora.org> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c >> b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c >> index a4bfea5..306bf2f 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv_core.c >> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t reset_link(struct pci_dev >> *dev) >> } >> >> /** >> - * do_recovery - handle nonfatal/fatal error recovery process >> + * pci_do_recovery - handle nonfatal/fatal error recovery process >> * @dev: pointer to a pci_dev data structure of agent detecting an >> error >> * @severity: error severity type >> * >> @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t reset_link(struct pci_dev >> *dev) >> * error detected message to all downstream drivers within a >> hierarchy in >> * question and return the returned code. >> */ >> -static void do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, int severity) >> +static void pci_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, int severity) > > Maybe pcie_do_recovery? > sure will take care. Thanks. > Otherwise looks fine: > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists