[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85f66284-2e18-2a74-1e7b-9378353ab43e@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 01:32:53 -0800
From: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
joel@....id.au, andrew@...id.au, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, jdelvare@...e.com,
benh@...nel.crashing.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] [PATCH 7/8] drivers/hwmon: Add a generic PECI
hwmon client driver
On 2/23/2018 4:00 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:29 AM, Jae Hyun Yoo
> <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On 2/21/2018 4:37 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But even with this change, it still needs to use delayed creation
>>>> because BMC side kernel doesn't know how many DIMMs are populated on
>>>> a remote server before the remote server completes its memory
>>>> training and testing in BIOS, but it needs to check the remote
>>>> server's CPU temperature as immediate as possible to make
>>>> appropriate thermal control based on the remote CPU's temperature to
>>>> avoid any critical thermal issue. What would be a better solution in
>>>> this case?
>>>
>>>
>>> You could change this driver so that it supports one DIMM. Move the
>>> 'hotplug' part into another driver which creates and destroys
>>> instances of the hwmon DIMM device as the DIMMS come and go.
>>>
>>> Also, do you need to handle CPU hotplug? You could split the CPU
>>> temperature part into a separate hwmon driver? And again create and
>>> destroy devices as CPUs come and go?
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>
>> That seems like a possible option. I'll rewrite the hwmon driver again like
>> that.
>>
>> Thanks for the good idea. :)
>
> By the way, in the rewrite, please try to avoid the create*workqueue()
> functions (they are deprecated :).
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>
Hi Miguel,
Thanks for letting me know that. I'll replace that with
alloc_workqueue(). :)
Regards,
Jae
>>
>> Jae
Powered by blists - more mailing lists