linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot/compressed/64: Prepare trampoline memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180225140958.76brtollupvrbuwy@node.shutemov.name>
Date:   Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:09:58 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
        mingo@...nel.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, gorcunov@...nvz.org, luto@...capital.net,
        linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot/compressed/64: Prepare trampoline memory

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 01:29:24PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 01:52:05PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Could you check if the patch below makes a difference?
> > 
> > If it is, could you check 0x9d000 address instead of 0x99000?
> 
> Both don't make a difference.

Hm. Could you share dmesg from the kernel that works fine?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov