[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180225202806.735a6870@alans-desktop>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 20:28:06 +0000
From: Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@...il.com>,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, linux-metag@...r.kernel.org,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support
> FWIW, alpha and m68k are known boot with qemu (even though m68k
> generates a warning traceback with the mainline kernel).
M68K works - people actively use it. Crazy people true 8). Alpha I
believe one or two people boot. I just need to track down some discs for
my Alpha 8)
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists