[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180225092223.GB923@wunner.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 10:22:23 +0100
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
tomi.valkeinen@...com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] driver core: Reprobe consumer if it was unbound by
dropped device_link
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 07:42:46PM +0200, Jyri Sarha wrote:
> Put consumer device to deferred probe list if it is unbound due to a
> dropped link to a supplier.
>
> When a device link supplier is unbound (either manually or because one
> of its own suppliers was unbound), its consumers are unbound as
> well. Currently if the supplier binds again after this the consumer
> does not automatically probe again. With this patch it does.
Yes I think this makes sense, based on the rationale that the consumer
was automatically unbound, so by symmetry it should also be automatically
rebound.
The only thing I don't understand is you wrote in an earlier e-mail of a
difference in behavior depending on whether driver_deferred_probe_add()
is called before or after device_release_driver_internal().
That's really odd, it shouldn't make a difference.
Thanks,
Lukas
>
> If this patch is not acceptable as such, how about adding this
> behavior behind a new device link flag?
>
> The idea to this patch was gotten from this post by Lucas Wunner:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg166318.html
>
> Part of the code and the description is borrowed from him.
>
> cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
> cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
> ---
> drivers/base/base.h | 1 +
> drivers/base/core.c | 2 ++
> drivers/base/dd.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/base.h b/drivers/base/base.h
> index d800de6..39370eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/base.h
> +++ b/drivers/base/base.h
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ extern void device_release_driver_internal(struct device *dev,
>
> extern void driver_detach(struct device_driver *drv);
> extern int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev);
> +extern void driver_deferred_probe_add(struct device *dev);
> extern void driver_deferred_probe_del(struct device *dev);
> static inline int driver_match_device(struct device_driver *drv,
> struct device *dev)
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index b2261f9..0964ed5 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -570,6 +570,8 @@ void device_links_unbind_consumers(struct device *dev)
>
> device_release_driver_internal(consumer, NULL,
> consumer->parent);
> + driver_deferred_probe_add(consumer);
> +
> put_device(consumer);
> goto start;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index de6fd09..846ae78 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static void deferred_probe_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> }
> static DECLARE_WORK(deferred_probe_work, deferred_probe_work_func);
>
> -static void driver_deferred_probe_add(struct device *dev)
> +void driver_deferred_probe_add(struct device *dev)
> {
> mutex_lock(&deferred_probe_mutex);
> if (list_empty(&dev->p->deferred_probe)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists