[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a7737cf-a5ba-c814-fdc7-45b5cdd47376@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:16:16 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
mingo@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bsingharora@...il.com, hbabu@...ibm.com, mhocko@...nel.org,
bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, corbet@....net,
arnd@...db.de, fweimer@...hat.com, msuchanek@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] mm, x86, powerpc: display pkey in smaps only if
arch supports pkeys
On 02/21/2018 03:52 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> Currently the architecture specific code is expected to
> display the protection keys in smap for a given vma.
> This can lead to redundant code and possibly to divergent
> formats in which the key gets displayed.
>
> This patch changes the implementation. It displays the
> pkey only if the architecture support pkeys, i.e
> arch_pkeys_enabled() returns true. This patch
> provides x86 implementation for arch_pkeys_enabled().
>
> x86 arch_show_smap() function is not needed anymore.
> Deleting it.
This looks fine to me. Thanks for doing these, Ram.
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists