[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1519681990-31349-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:52:51 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
Lihao Liang <lianglihao@...wei.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/20] rcu: Remove unnecessary spinlock in rcu_boot_init_percpu_data()
From: Lihao Liang <lianglihao@...wei.com>
Since rcu_boot_init_percpu_data() is only called at boot time,
there is no data race and spinlock is not needed.
Signed-off-by: Lihao Liang <lianglihao@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 491bdf39f276..66c73a214cff 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3636,12 +3636,9 @@ static void rcu_init_new_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf)
static void __init
rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
{
- unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
- struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
/* Set up local state, ensuring consistent view of global state. */
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
rdp->grpmask = leaf_node_cpu_bit(rdp->mynode, cpu);
rdp->dynticks = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nesting != 1);
@@ -3649,7 +3646,6 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
rdp->cpu = cpu;
rdp->rsp = rsp;
rcu_boot_init_nocb_percpu_data(rdp);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
}
/*
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists