linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a pipe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3122ec5a-7f73-f6b4-33ea-8c10ef32e5b0@virtuozzo.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:02:25 +0300
From:   Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...tuozzo.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, criu@...nvz.org, gdb@...rceware.org,
        devel@...ts.open-mpi.org, rr-dev@...illa.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] vm: add a syscall to map a process memory into a
 pipe

On 02/21/2018 03:44 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue,  9 Jan 2018 08:30:49 +0200 Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> This patches introduces new process_vmsplice system call that combines
>> functionality of process_vm_read and vmsplice.
> 
> All seems fairly strightforward.  The big question is: do we know that
> people will actually use this, and get sufficient value from it to
> justify its addition?

Yes, that's what bothers us a lot too :) I've tried to start with finding out if anyone 
used the sys_read/write_process_vm() calls, but failed :( Does anybody know how popular
these syscalls are? If its users operate on big amount of memory, they could benefit from
the proposed splice extension.

-- Pavel