linux-kernel - [PATCH] direct-io: Minor cleanups in do_blockdev_direct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1519638870-17756-1-git-send-email-nborisov@suse.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:54:30 +0200
From:   Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH] direct-io: Minor cleanups in do_blockdev_direct_IO

We already get the block counts and the calculate the end block at the
beginning of the function. Let's use the local variables for consistency and
readability. No functional changes

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
---
Andrew, 

Sending to you since this has been languishing on the mailing for quite some 
time. The patch has been reviewed here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1460544.html

fs/direct-io.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/direct-io.c b/fs/direct-io.c
index a8131087aa1c..a73448a501c2 100644
--- a/fs/direct-io.c
+++ b/fs/direct-io.c
@@ -1200,7 +1200,7 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
 	}
 
 	/* watch out for a 0 len io from a tricksy fs */
-	if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ && !iov_iter_count(iter))
+	if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ && !count)
 		return 0;
 
 	dio = kmem_cache_alloc(dio_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1316,8 +1316,7 @@ do_blockdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct inode *inode,
 
 	dio->should_dirty = (iter->type == ITER_IOVEC);
 	sdio.iter = iter;
-	sdio.final_block_in_request =
-		(offset + iov_iter_count(iter)) >> blkbits;
+	sdio.final_block_in_request = end >> blkbits;
 
 	/*
 	 * In case of non-aligned buffers, we may need 2 more
-- 
2.7.4