[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180226103058.GB19841@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 10:30:58 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
nsekhar@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] PCI: dra7xx: Enable x2 mode support for dra74x,
dra76x and dra72x
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 02:28:23PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> dra74x/dra76x and dra72x has separate compatible strings. Add support
s/has/have
> for these compatible strings in pci-dra7xx driver to perform syscon
> configurations required to get x2 mode working.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> index e77a4ceed74c..3b4427c10228 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
> @@ -83,11 +83,15 @@
> #define MSI_REQ_GRANT BIT(0)
> #define MSI_VECTOR_SHIFT 7
>
> +#define PCIE_1LANE_2LANE_SELECTION BIT(13)
> +#define PCIE_B1C0_MODE_SEL BIT(2)
> +
> struct dra7xx_pcie {
> struct dw_pcie *pci;
> void __iomem *base; /* DT ti_conf */
> int phy_count; /* DT phy-names count */
> struct phy **phy;
> + u32 *b1c0_mask;
This looks unused in the current patch.
> int link_gen;
> struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode;
> @@ -95,6 +99,7 @@ struct dra7xx_pcie {
>
> struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data {
> enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode;
> + u32 b1co_mode_sel_mask;
> };
>
> #define to_dra7xx_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> @@ -533,6 +538,26 @@ static const struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data dra7xx_pcie_ep_of_data = {
> .mode = DW_PCIE_EP_TYPE,
> };
>
> +static const struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data dra746_pcie_rc_of_data = {
> + .b1co_mode_sel_mask = BIT(2),
Nit: DT guys are more familiar than me on how this data should be
encoded but maybe bit offset + length can be better ? I do not know, I
have no problem leaving them as masks.
> + .mode = DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data dra726_pcie_rc_of_data = {
> + .b1co_mode_sel_mask = GENMASK(3, 2),
> + .mode = DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data dra746_pcie_ep_of_data = {
> + .b1co_mode_sel_mask = BIT(2),
> + .mode = DW_PCIE_EP_TYPE,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data dra726_pcie_ep_of_data = {
> + .b1co_mode_sel_mask = GENMASK(3, 2),
> + .mode = DW_PCIE_EP_TYPE,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id of_dra7xx_pcie_match[] = {
> {
> .compatible = "ti,dra7-pcie",
> @@ -542,6 +567,22 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_dra7xx_pcie_match[] = {
> .compatible = "ti,dra7-pcie-ep",
> .data = &dra7xx_pcie_ep_of_data,
> },
> + {
> + .compatible = "ti,dra746-pcie-rc",
> + .data = &dra746_pcie_rc_of_data,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "ti,dra726-pcie-rc",
> + .data = &dra726_pcie_rc_of_data,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "ti,dra746-pcie-ep",
> + .data = &dra746_pcie_ep_of_data,
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "ti,dra726-pcie-ep",
> + .data = &dra726_pcie_ep_of_data,
> + },
> {},
> };
>
> @@ -587,6 +628,47 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_ep_unaligned_memaccess(struct device *dev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int dra7xx_pcie_configure_two_lane(struct device *dev,
> + u32 b1co_mode_sel_mask)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct regmap *pcie_syscon;
> + unsigned int pcie_reg;
> +
> + pcie_syscon = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np,
> + "ti,syscon-lane-conf");
> + if (IS_ERR(pcie_syscon)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to get ti,syscon-lane-conf\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32_index(np, "ti,syscon-lane-conf", 1,
> + &pcie_reg)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "couldn't get lane configuration reg offset\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + regmap_update_bits(pcie_syscon, pcie_reg, PCIE_1LANE_2LANE_SELECTION,
> + PCIE_1LANE_2LANE_SELECTION);
I do not know if this can create issues but the regmap should clear
those bits in the error path ?
> +
> + pcie_syscon = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "ti,syscon-lane-sel");
> + if (IS_ERR(pcie_syscon)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to get ti,syscon-lane-sel\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32_index(np, "ti,syscon-lane-sel", 1,
> + &pcie_reg)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "couldn't get lane selection reg offset\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + regmap_update_bits(pcie_syscon, pcie_reg, b1co_mode_sel_mask,
> + PCIE_B1C0_MODE_SEL);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> u32 reg;
> @@ -608,6 +690,7 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> const struct of_device_id *match;
> const struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data *data;
> enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode;
> + u32 b1co_mode_sel_mask;
Again, do you need this temporary variable (given that you pass the
value below) ?
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(of_dra7xx_pcie_match), dev);
> if (!match)
> @@ -615,6 +698,7 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> data = (struct dra7xx_pcie_of_data *)match->data;
> mode = (enum dw_pcie_device_mode)data->mode;
> + b1co_mode_sel_mask = data->b1co_mode_sel_mask;
>
> dra7xx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dra7xx), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!dra7xx)
> @@ -673,6 +757,12 @@ static int __init dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dra7xx->pci = pci;
> dra7xx->phy_count = phy_count;
>
> + if (phy_count == 2) {
> + ret = dra7xx_pcie_configure_two_lane(dev, b1co_mode_sel_mask);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_link;
> + }
> +
> ret = dra7xx_pcie_enable_phy(dra7xx);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to enable phy\n");
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists