linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3866d359-0ef8-6a99-6254-84890be62b93@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:18:07 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version

On 26/02/2018 13:16, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/02/2018 13:15, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:54:52PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> I don't understand how one thing follows from the other.  How are writes
>>> to 0x8B related to having a virtualized microcode loaded (which is a
>>> concept that actually makes no sense at all)?
>>
>> I'm questioning the whole idea. 0x8b is the MSR which gives you the
>> microcode revision. Most CPUs don't even allow writing to it, AFAICT.
>> (SDM says "may prevent writing" on VM transitions.)
>>
>> So how is that host-initiated write to 0x8b is even going to work, in
>> reality? kvm module writes the microcode version in there? How does the
>> admin work around that?
> 
> In this context, "host-initiated" write means written by KVM userspace
> with ioctl(KVM_SET_MSR).  It generally happens only on VM startup, reset
> or live migration.

To be clear, the target of the write is still the vCPU's emulated MSR.

Paolo