[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180226024701.GO7000@dastard>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:47:01 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] vfs: Use dlock list for SB's s_inodes list
Hi Waiman,
What's happened to this patchset? Any plans to repost a more recent
version?
FYI, I just ran a workload that hit 60% CPU usage on sb inode list
lock contention - a multithreaded bulkstat scan of an XFS filesystem
with millions of inodes on SSDs. last time I ran this (about 18
months ago now!) I saw rates of about 600,000 inodes/s being scanned
from userspace. The run I did earlier today made 300,000 inodes/s on
the same 16p machine and was completely CPU bound....
Cheers,
Dave.
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 02:50:54PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> v7->v8:
> - Integrate the additional patches 8, 9 and 10 sent to fix issues in
> the original v7 patchset into patch 1 and adjust the other patches
> accordingly.
>
> v6->v7:
> - Fix outdated email address.
> - Add a comment to patch 4 to explain allocation issue & fix a
> compilation problem with cpumask.
> - Replace patch 6 with another one that adds an irqsafe mode argument
> in alloc_dlock_list_heads() instead of adding new APIs.
>
> v5->v6:
> - Rebased the patch to 4.14-rc3.
> - Drop the fsnotify patch as it had been merged somehow.
> - Add a new patch 5 with alternative way of selecting list by hashing
> instead of cpu #.
> - Add a new patch 6 to proivde a set irq safe APIs to be used in
> interrupt context.
> - Update the CPU to index mapping code.
>
> v4->v5:
> - Rebased the patch to 4.8-rc1 (changes to fs/fs-writeback.c was
> dropped).
> - Use kcalloc() instead of percpu_alloc() to allocate the dlock list
> heads structure as suggested by Christoph Lameter.
> - Replaced patch 5 by another one that made sibling CPUs use the same
> dlock list head thus reducing the number of list heads that needed
> to be maintained.
>
> v3->v4:
> - As suggested by Al, encapsulate the dlock list mechanism into
> the dlist_for_each_entry() and dlist_for_each_entry_safe()
> which are the equivalent of list_for_each_entry() and
> list_for_each_entry_safe() for regular linked list. That simplifies
> the changes in the call sites that perform dlock list iterations.
> - Add a new patch to make the percpu head structure cacheline aligned
> to prevent cacheline contention from disrupting the performance
> of nearby percpu variables.
>
> v2->v3:
> - Remove the 2 persubnode API patches.
> - Merge __percpu tag patch 2 into patch 1.
> - As suggested by Tejun Heo, restructure the dlock_list_head data
> structure to hide the __percpu tag and rename some of the functions
> and structures.
> - Move most of the code from dlock_list.h to dlock_list.c and export
> the symbols.
>
> v1->v2:
> - Add a set of simple per-subnode APIs that is between percpu and
> per-node in granularity.
> - Make dlock list to use the per-subnode APIs so as to reduce the
> total number of separate linked list that needs to be managed
> and iterated.
> - There is no change in patches 1-5.
>
> This patchset provides new APIs for a set of distributed locked lists
> (one/CPU core) to minimize lock and cacheline contention. Insertion
> and deletion to the list will be cheap and relatively contention free.
> Lookup, on the other hand, may be a bit more costly as there are
> multiple lists to iterate. This is not really a problem for the
> replacement of superblock's inode list by dlock list included in
> the patchset as lookup isn't needed.
>
> For use cases that need to do lookup, the dlock list can also be
> treated as a set of hashed lists that scales with the number of CPU
> cores in the system.
>
> Both patches 5 and 6 are added to support other use cases like epoll
> nested callbacks, for example, which could use the dlock-list to
> reduce lock contention problem.
>
> Patch 1 introduces the dlock list. The list heads are allocated
> by kcalloc() instead of percpu_alloc(). Each list head entry is
> cacheline aligned to minimize contention.
>
> Patch 2 replaces the use of list_for_each_entry_safe() in
> evict_inodes() and invalidate_inodes() by list_for_each_entry().
>
> Patch 3 modifies the superblock and inode structures to use the dlock
> list. The corresponding functions that reference those structures
> are modified.
>
> Patch 4 makes the sibling CPUs use the same dlock list head to reduce
> the number of list heads that need to be iterated.
>
> Patch 5 enables alternative use case of as a set of hashed lists.
>
> Patch 6 provides an irq safe mode specified at dlock-list allocation
> time so that it can be used within interrupt context.
>
> Jan Kara (1):
> vfs: Remove unnecessary list_for_each_entry_safe() variants
>
> Waiman Long (5):
> lib/dlock-list: Distributed and lock-protected lists
> vfs: Use dlock list for superblock's inode list
> lib/dlock-list: Make sibling CPUs share the same linked list
> lib/dlock-list: Enable faster lookup with hashing
> lib/dlock-list: Add an IRQ-safe mode to be used in interrupt handler
>
> fs/block_dev.c | 9 +-
> fs/drop_caches.c | 9 +-
> fs/inode.c | 38 ++----
> fs/notify/fsnotify.c | 9 +-
> fs/quota/dquot.c | 14 +-
> fs/super.c | 7 +-
> include/linux/dlock-list.h | 263 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/fs.h | 8 +-
> lib/Makefile | 2 +-
> lib/dlock-list.c | 333 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 10 files changed, 638 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/dlock-list.h
> create mode 100644 lib/dlock-list.c
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists