linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] [media] Add Rockchip RK1608 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3613277.0XuNfbW5nk@phil>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:15:44 +0100
From:   Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Wen Nuan <leo.wen@...k-chips.com>,
        David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        jacob2.chen@...k-chips.com,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Eddie Cai <eddie.cai@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] [media] Add Rockchip RK1608 driver

Hi Linus,

thanks for catching these things :-) .

Am Montag, 26. Februar 2018, 11:12:30 CET schrieb Linus Walleij:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Wen Nuan <leo.wen@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> > +               pdata->grf_gpio2b_iomux = ioremap((resource_size_t)
> > +                                                 (GRF_BASE_ADDR +
> > +                                                  GRF_GPIO2B_IOMUX), 4);
> > +               grf_val = __raw_readl(pdata->grf_gpio2b_iomux);
> > +               __raw_writel(((grf_val) | (1 << 6) | (1 << (6 + 16))),
> > +                            pdata->grf_gpio2b_iomux);
> > +
> > +               pdata->grf_io_vsel = ioremap((resource_size_t)
> > +                                             (GRF_BASE_ADDR + GRF_IO_VSEL), 4);
> > +               grf_val = __raw_readl(pdata->grf_io_vsel);
> > +               __raw_writel(((grf_val) | (1 << 1) | (1 << (1 + 16))),
> > +                            pdata->grf_io_vsel);
> 
> You are doing pin control on the side of the pin control subsystem
> it looks like?
> 
> I think David Wu and Heiko Stubner needs to have a look at what you
> are doing here to suggest other solutions.

Especially as the rk1608 seems to be some a spi-connected peripheral.
So it should definitly not touch _any_ soc-specific registers at all.

I just looked up the patch in patchwork and apart from the one Linus
quoted above, I found quite a bit more open-coded pinctrl settings
as well as direct writes to the clock controller and even io-voltage
selections.

All these things are highly soc-specific so vary with each soc this
ic gets connected to and the kernel does provide abstractions for
all of them. For clock-rates there are the clock-apis and also
the assigned-clock* properties for the devicetree, pinctrl supports
multiple states and io-vsel selections normally should just monitor
the supply-regulator via the io-domain driver we already have
[See vqmmc handling in for sd-cards for example].

So this driver should not touch anything of that sort and therefore
should _not_ contain any iomem-based read or write at all.

Heiko