lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd=ZCCa-edJmM3GurXsYyNjpsKn1n9YJzc2fgw-nZPZWg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 19:56:10 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Robert Abel <rabel@...ertabel.eu>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] auxdisplay: charlcd: fix x/y address commands

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Miguel Ojeda
>> <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>>> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 1:54 AM, Robert Abel <rabel@...ertabel.eu> wrote:
>>
>>>>> +                       if ('x' == cmd) {
>>>>> +                               if (kstrtoul(esc, 10, &tmp_addr.x) < 0)
>>>>>                                         break;
>>>>
>>>>> +                       } else if ('y' == cmd) {
>>>>> +                               if (kstrtoul(esc, 10, &tmp_addr.y) < 0)
>>>>>                                         break;
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps instead of dancing around kstrtox() better to switch to
>>>> simple_strtoul() ?
>>>
>>> It seems deprecated:
>>>
>>> /* Obsolete, do not use.  Use kstrto<foo> instead */
>>> extern unsigned long simple_strtoul(const char *,char **,unsigned int);
>>
>> It has been discussed several times. The comment is simple wrong.
>>
>> Because of the requirement of kstrtox() to have a \0 or \n followed by
>> \0 as "end of field".
>> simple_strto*() is suitable to be run in place.
>
> I agree that in-place versions of these kind of string functions are
> very useful, don't get me wrong! But unless someone changes the
> "official" comment, we shouldn't add new code relying on them.

I don't know what you afraid of, but be my guest.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ