lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49DA8C17-0960-4EBF-9FA7-364DE5EAF405@cnexlabs.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:27:13 +0000
From:   Javier Gonzalez <javier@...xlabs.com>
To:     Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io>
CC:     "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/19] lightnvm: pblk: implement 2.0 support

> On 26 Feb 2018, at 19.24, Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io> wrote:
> 
> On 02/26/2018 07:21 PM, Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>>> On 26 Feb 2018, at 19.19, Matias Bjørling <mb@...htnvm.io> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 02/26/2018 02:16 PM, Javier González wrote:
>>>> # Changes since V2:
>>>> Apply Matias' feedback:
>>>>  - Remove generic nvm_id identify structure.
>>>>  - Do not remap capabilities (cap) to media and controlled capabilities
>>>>    (mccap). Instead, add a comment to prevent confusion when
>>>>    crosschecking with 2.0 spec.
>>>>  - Change maxoc and maxocpu defaults from 1 block to the max number of
>>>>    blocks.
>>>>  - Re-implement the generic geometry to use nvm_geo on both device and
>>>>    targets. Maintain nvm_common_geo to make it easier to copy the common
>>>>    part of the geometry (without having to overwrite target-specific
>>>>    fields, which is ugly and error prone). Matias, if you still want to
>>>>    get rid of this, we can do it.
>>> 
>>> I do, the variables should go directly in nvm_geo. Thanks.
>> Ok. Is the rest ok with you?
> I'll go through it when the rebase is posted. Most of the patches is
> dependent on the first patch.

As it is now, it will be basically %s/geo->c.X/geo->X/g. If you can look
at the first patch now, I can put all comments in a single version more,
instead of going through one extra cycle...



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ