linux-kernel - Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm, mlock, vmscan] 9c4e6b1a70: stress-ng.hdd.ops_per_sec -7.9% regression

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:56:45 +0800
From:   Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, lkp@...org,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [mm, mlock, vmscan] 9c4e6b1a70:
 stress-ng.hdd.ops_per_sec -7.9% regression

On 02/26, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>Hi, Shakeel 
>
>On 02/25, Shakeel Butt wrote:
>>On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:44 AM, kernel test robot
>><xiaolong.ye@...el.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Greeting,
>>>
>>> FYI, we noticed a -7.9% regression of stress-ng.hdd.ops_per_sec due to commit:
>>>
>>>
>>> commit: 9c4e6b1a7027f102990c0395296015a812525f4d ("mm, mlock, vmscan: no more skipping pagevecs")
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>>
>>> in testcase: stress-ng
>>> on test machine: 88 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz with 128G memory
>>> with following parameters:
>>>
>>
>>Hi Xiaolong,
>>
>>Is there a way I can get the output of "perf record -a -g" running in
>>parallel to the actual test on this machine. As I have mentioned
>>before I am not able to reproduce this issue. However I am trying to
>>repro on a VM with 4 vcpus and 4 GiB memory and I don't see any
>>difference. I am suspecting that it may repro on a larger machine but
>>I don't have access to one.
>>
>
>perf.data attached. It was generated via `perf record -q -ag --realtime=1 -m 256`

Attached perf-profile.gz is the result of `perf report` result.

Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>Thanks,
>Xiaolong
>
>>thanks,
>>Shakeel
>_______________________________________________
>LKP mailing list
>LKP@...ts.01.org
>https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp

Download attachment "perf.data" of type "application/octet-stream" (250924 bytes)

Download attachment "perf-profile.gz" of type "application/octet-stream" (2801 bytes)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives